Miranda v. Glamour Footwear, Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant Mario J. Miranda challenges the in personam jurisdiction the trial court found him subject to by virtue of the Florida Long Arm Statute. The crux of our agreement with the trial court is that it was Miranda himself who approached Wilfredo Agusti of the appellee corporation to solicit and negotiate the purchase of shoes. Miranda physically was in the appellee’s office in Dade County, looked over the stock and took samples of the shoes back to Costa Rica. One check was drawn by Miranda on a Dade County bank payable to appellee, and it was Miranda who called Agusti to offer to sign a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- World Class Yachts, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-TelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Livre v. 3 Dolphin Industries Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc. v. KearnsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999