Legal Opinion

(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 20, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00888Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRISTINA Y. FLORES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00888-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY 13 v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 21) SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Monica Perales of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC (“Counsel”), 20 attorney for Cristina Y. Flores (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney fees on 21 December 14, 2022. (Mot. Att’y Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 21.) Counsel requests fees in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. Oriental Financial Group, Inc. v. Cooperativa De Ahorro Y Crédito OrientalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Russell v. KeeranSupreme Court of Virginia · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API