Legal Opinion

South Carolina Department of Social Services ex rel. Roseboro v. Burris

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 1989No. 22985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

*538Willie Burris (Burris) appeals an order finding him to be the father of Marie Roseboro’s (Marie) son, Frederick, and requiring child support. We affirm.

Frederick was born on October 13, 1970, at which time Marie was legally married to James E. Roseboro. Over objection, the Roseboros testified that, after separating in 1966, they never had sexual relations. On the other hand, Burris admitted having sexual relations with Marie both before and after Frederick’s birth. Based upon this evidence, the Family Court found Burris to be Frederick’s father.

ISSUES

Burris contends the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF G'VILLE v. Manos Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. BARR'S NEXT OF KIN v. Cherokee, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Cave v. CaveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Chandler v. MerrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API