Legal Opinion

United States v. Gomez

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 30, 2009No. 08 Civ. 171 (DC), 99 Cr. 1048 (DC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHIN, District Judge.

Pro se defendant Jaime Gomez moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution when he was convicted of conspiracy, murder, and narcotics charges. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. 1

BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Because Gomez was convicted, the evidence presented at trial is construed in the light most favorable to the Government. See United States v. Morales, 974 F.Supp. 315, 318…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. UmehDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Awulye v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Gomez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  4. Gomez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API