Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1891No. 3267PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Smith. Tried below before Hon. Felix J. McCoed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief,Justice.

Appellee while in employment of appellant as a section hand was injured while on a hand car that was struck by another following it, and he claims that this resulted from a defective brake on the hindmost car.

After plaintiff had announced ready for trial defendant sought a continuance or postponement of the case until a later day of the term, and also presented a motion for rule on plaintiff to give security for costs. The application for continuance did not show sufficient diligence to procure the attendance of the witness for whose absence a continuance or…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Naderhoff v. Geo. Benz & SonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Texas Railway Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Southern Pacific Company v. LeashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Crews v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API