Legal Opinion
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Watertown
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders in Matter of Niagara Mohawk v Town of Bethlehem and Matter of Niagara Mohawk v Town of Tonawanda Assessor should be affirmed, with costs; and the order in Matter of Niagara Mohawk v Town of Watertown should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, an energy resources company, owns mass property such as poles, wires, insulators and pipelines for transporting and distributing electricity and natural gas to its residential and commercial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York Telephone Co. v. Supervisor of Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Tonawanda AssessorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by15 opinions
- Abele v. DimitriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Adams v. SchoenstadtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Keyspan Gas East Corp. v. Supervisor of TownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- New York Telephone Co. v. Supervisor of Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Long Island Water Corp. v. Supervisor of Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.