McClellan v. Shapiro
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action 1 are nineteen year old AFDC recipients whose welfare benefits were discontinued by Section 5 of Public Act 730, a 1969 amendment to Connecticut’s state welfare statutes. 2 Section 5 defines a dependent child, for purposes of AFDC eligibility, 3 as follows:
“ ‘dependent child’ means a needy child under the age of nineteen, or who attains the age of nineteen while in full-time attendance in a secondary school during a school year, who has been deprived of parental support or care * * 4
They attack the statute on two…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Francis v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Wilczynski v. HarderDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- In Re ConleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- In Re ShumakerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1991
- Osmond v. SpenceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.