Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 2016No. C075126PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

The federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.; hereafter IGRA) permits gaming on Indian lands taken into trust for the benefit of a tribe after October 17, 1988, if the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) inter alia determines it would be in the best interest of the tribe and would not be detrimental to the surrounding community, and the governor of the state in which the land is located concurs with the determination (25 U.S.C. § 2719(b)(1)(A)). IGRA requires a tribal-state compact for the conduct of class III gaming (casino-style gaming),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API