Legal Opinion

Mitchell Golbert v. The Renegotiation Board

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 23, 1958No. 224, Docket 24796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner seeks reversal of a decision of the Tax Court determining that in the year 1952 he was a “subcontractor” subject to the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1211-1233, and that he was not a full-time “employee” exempt from the coverage of the Act by Section 103(g) thereof. The Findings of Fact and Opinion of the Tax Court, 28 T.C. 728, that petitioner failed to establish that he was an employee are adequately supported by substantial evidence. Hence we consider only the claim by the petitioner that the Tax Court erred by placing upon him the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Factor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. The Boeing Company, Formerly Boeing Airplane Company v. The Renegotiation Board of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Baltensperger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API