Christman v. Christman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to amend, modify or vacate a prior order continuing a temporary suspension of appellant James Christman’s visitation rights and requiring him to pay attorney’s fees and other costs. The parties were divorced in Indiana, but a jurisdictional dispute was resolved in favor of the Minnesota court. Appellant contends that the order awarding attorney’s fees and costs denies him a hearing on the merits. We dismiss the appeal, as taken from a nonappealable order.
FACTS
James Christman and Borghild Christ-man, now Borghild Larsen,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Salo v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Mondale v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963