Legal Opinion

Christman v. Christman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1985No. C8-84-1583Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to amend, modify or vacate a prior order continuing a temporary suspension of appellant James Christman’s visitation rights and requiring him to pay attorney’s fees and other costs. The parties were divorced in Indiana, but a jurisdictional dispute was resolved in favor of the Minnesota court. Appellant contends that the order awarding attorney’s fees and costs denies him a hearing on the merits. We dismiss the appeal, as taken from a nonappealable order.

FACTS

James Christman and Borghild Christ-man, now Borghild Larsen,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salo v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Mondale v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API