Legal Opinion

Hauss v. Niblack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8574PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— The United States had suits pending against the appellants and others, on twelve distillery bonds; Hauss, Jones and Gorman were each on one of the bonds; Robb, Alvis and Cunningham were each on three; Federer, Hazelton, Turpin and Hyneman were each on two of the bonds. Before the institution of this suit, three of the bondsmen, Lamb, Lewis and Holcomb,were dead; Lamb and Lewfishad administrators; Holcomb had none and had died insolvent.

This suit was brought by the appellee against all the living bondsmen, except John ~W. Bingham, and against the administrators of Lamb and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toney v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bosworth v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Provines v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lung v. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rains v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Firebaugh v. TroughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Estate of Anderson v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Willison v. McKainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API