Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LaVALLEY v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 2010No. 5D08-3240Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTorpy, J.

I concur that we should deny the motion for rehearing but would not grant the request for certification. In his motion for rehearing, Appellant urges that our decision contravenes Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), which Appellant says established a “wholly different legal landscape.” Apprendi was predicated on the constitutional right to a jury trial and held that a defendant has the constitutional right to have a jury decide all the facts that bear on the magnitude of the defendant’s punishment, except his or her prior record. Apprendi has no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Buchanan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API