Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

McDonald v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 2010No. 08-1521Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Thomas

I agree with the Court that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the right to keep and bear arms set forth in the Second Amendment “fully applicable to the States.” Ante, at 750. I write separately because I believe there is a more straightforward path to this conclusion, one that is more *806faithful to the Fourteenth Amendment’s text and history. I therefore do not join Parts II-C, IV, and V of the principal opinion.

Applying what is now a well-settled test, the Court concludes that the right to keep and bear arms applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause because it…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API