Legal Opinion

Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 11, 1989No. Court 83-10-01574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AQUILINO, Judge:

This action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84(b), challenges the method by which the U.S. Customs Service determined the “United States value” of wearing apparel entered from Mexico before July 1, 1980 and the “deductive value” of similar merchandise entered after that date. The dispositive issue is one of law; no genuine issue of material fact is presented, and the parties, appropriately, have interposed cross-motions for summary judgment.

I

Those motions show, among other things, (1) that the merchandise was assembled abroad in whole or in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. BlumenthalUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. Millmaster International Inc., Millmaster International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Moss Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Figure Flattery, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API