Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Rhodes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1994Published

1DissentWallach, J.

Petitioner, claiming to be the victim of a hit-and-run accident, sought to commence this action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC). Identification of an offending vehicle would preclude any recovery against MVAIC.

The only evidence cited to sustain the IAS Court’s dismissal of the action was a police accident report, entirely incompetent for the purpose offered, which identified the offending vehicle as belonging to additional respondent Biggs, and insured by additional respondent Liberty Mutual. That identification reference was hearsay, and should have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Murray v. DonlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Toll v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Quaglio v. TomaselliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Sansevere v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API