Legal Opinion
People v. Erazo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered July 18, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the factual recitation of his plea was deficient is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Furthermore, the record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty with the assistance of competent *478counsel.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AsencioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. CabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. McNeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.