Morris v. Marqueze & Varney
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partnership Evidence. Fraud. Statute of Frauds. Notice. Charge of Court. Before J. T. Pendleton, Esq., Judge pro hao vice Fulton Superior Court. March Term, 1884. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Hook & Smith, a firm doing business in Atlanta, became indebted to plaintiffs, who were merchants in Boston, for goods which the plaintiffs had furnished them previous to the fall of 1881. In the latter part of October of that year, their agent became uneasy about their claim, and called several times at the store of Hook &; Smith to see after it, and also consulted an attorney in relation to its collection. Plook assured this agent, Grasty, that it was all right; that his firm was worth $10,000.00 or $12,000.00 above its liabilities, and he was going to get in a rich partner;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hayden v. Atlanta Cotton FactorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheppard v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Reynolds v. HindmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891