Barclay v. Barrie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Cross-appeals by the plaintiff, Reginald Gr. Barclay, and' the defendant, Alexander Barrie, from parts of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of New York on- the 2d day of July, 1910, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term, as amended nunc pro tuneby an order entered-in said clerk’s office on the 22d day of July, 1910. ,
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
This case' is brought before us by cross-appeals from an interlocutory judgment, of dissolution of a copartnership. Defendant appeals *671because, as lie says, no judgment of dissolution should have been granted. Plaintiff appeals because the dissolution is decreed to take effect as of the date of the judgment instead of an earlier date when the plaintiff undertook to dissolve the firm by notice.
Plaintiff and defendant are copartners in the firm known as Barclay & Co. No. 15, being the fifteenth renewal of a copartnership which commenced to do business in 1873 under the same firm name.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Raymond v. VaughnIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Friedburgher v. JabergNew York Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barclay v. BarrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911