Legal Opinion

Henry v. Duane Morris LLP

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2006No. 06-30194UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

INTRODUCTION

Duane Morris, LLP (“Duane Morris”), represented Michael Henry in litigation against Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”). That lawsuit was dismissed because it was time barred, and Henry filed the instant malpractice suit seeking damages from Duane Morris. The district court dismissed the malpractice suit because it is time barred by Louisiana law. Henry appeals, arguing that Illinois law should govern the claim. We affirm the district court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Henry, a Louisiana citizen, hired the law firm of Duane Morris, LLP, in 2000 to represent him in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, CharteredAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Henry v. Maxum Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  2. Henry v. Maxum Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  3. Henry v. Maxum Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  4. Henry v. Maxum Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Henry v. Maxum Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API