Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 2010No. A10A0143, A10A1035Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Mark Daniel Scott, Jr., guilty of making false statements and failing to report as required by the Georgia Sex Offender Registry. Scott has filed two appeals, both appealing the conviction entered on the verdict and the denial of his motion for a new trial.

Case No. A10A0143

In Case No. A10A0143, Scott claims that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error and affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Bryson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API