Legal Opinion · Concurrence

International Harvester Co. v. County of Douglas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1945No. Nos. 31948, 31949, 31950Published

1ConcurrenceWenke, J.

I concur with the conclusion arrived at in the majority opinion both for the reason that the taxpayer followed the wrong procedure and that the facts of the case make the intangible property here involved taxable under, the provisions of section 77-713, R. S. 1943.

However, I do not agree with the opinion insofar as it holds that under the provisions of our Constitution and the laws of this state that all intangibles in this state should be returned, assessed, and taxed in Nebraska without regard to whether the owner is a nonresident, nor do I find any decision of this court cited in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tappan v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Latrobe v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Hunter v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Finch v. County of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Crane Co. v. City Council of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API