Legal Opinion

Boomer v. . Gibbs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Civil actiox for title and possession of land, tried at the Fall Term, 1892, of the Superior Court of ILydk County, before Hoke, J. The plaintiffs deraigned title through— First, grant to William Watson, dated October 2, 1817; second, will of William Watson devising one-half of the land covered by the patent each to his sons, Augustus and James M. Watson; third, deeds of James M. Watson to plaintiff, W. W. Boomer, dated February, 1873, and of Augustus Watson to plaintiff,…

Read the full summary

Civil actiox for title and possession of land, tried at the Fall Term, 1892, of the Superior Court of ILydk County, before Hoke, J. The plaintiffs deraigned title through— First, grant to William Watson, dated October 2, 1817; second, will of William Watson devising one-half of the land covered by the patent each to his sons, Augustus and James M. Watson; third, deeds of James M. Watson to plaintiff, W. W. Boomer, dated February, 1873, and of Augustus Watson to plaintiff, Riley Murray, dated August, 1852, conveying their respective interests in the land embraced within the limits of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Avicry, J.:

The land in controversy is included within the lines indicated on the map by the letters and figures 8, I, 1), C, B to 8, and the first question íaised by the testimony was whether the limits of the John Gray Blount patent extended north to V and then ran south 82 east so as to include the locus in quo, or no further north than A, so that the next line would run south of it to B. The call of the patent which gave rise to the dispute was, “ Then with the same (English’s ditch just previously mentioned as the terminus of the line running west 220 poles) and the road northwardly seven…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. McLean v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Redmond v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Osborne v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. Dobson v. . WhisenhantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Everett v. . NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Currie v. . GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API