Legal Opinion

Worcester National Bank v. Cheney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was a motion on behalf of the unsuccessful party in this suit, the appellee, to quash a fee bill from the office of the clerk of this court in the Central Grand Division.

1Per curiam

This is a motion by the unsuccessful party to quash the fee bill in the above cause, and to have the costs retaxed. Objection is taken to but a single item, viz: the sum of $297.50, for making the transcript of the record for the Supreme Court.

It appears the clerk of the circuit court from which this case omes to this court did not himself make the transcript, but he did permit counsel for plaintiff in error to have it prepared at the expense of their client, and when it was completed it was certified by the clerk as being correct. No fees were paid to the clerk for that part of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. DorrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Roby v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. Wong WangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Schumacher v. GramelspacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API