Legal Opinion

Kyle C. McClamma v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 22, 2017No. 15-14962 Non-Argument CalendarUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Kyle McClamma, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate. In that motion, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Mr. McClamma challenged a special condition of supervised release which, as relevant here, allows him to have visitation with his older daughter only when monitored by an approved third-party supervisor. 1

We affirm. Assuming that Mr. McClam-ma’s motion to vacate was timely filed, and that there are no procedural defaults, we conclude that Mr. McClamma is not entitled to relief. In 2011, “Mr. McClamma and the government agreed to modify the terms of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Christopher LoveCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Kyle E. McClammaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Kyle E. McClammaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API