Legal Opinion
Keller v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1994No. OTC 3163, 3164, 3165, 3166, 3194 SC S40156PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In this appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court, taxpayers claim that they are entitled to a credit under ORS 316.082(1) for their payment of the Business and Occupation Tax (B & O tax) levied by the State of Washington. ORS 316.082(1) provides, in part:
“A resident individual shall be allowed a credit against the tax otherwise due under this chapter for the amount of any income tax imposed on the individual * * * for the taxable year by another state of the United States * * * on income derived from sources therein and that is also subject to tax under this chapter.” (Emphasis…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Zunamon v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Morris v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Avni V. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000
- Ludwig v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.