Legal Opinion

Keller v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1994No. OTC 3163, 3164, 3165, 3166, 3194 SC S40156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

In this appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court, taxpayers claim that they are entitled to a credit under ORS 316.082(1) for their payment of the Business and Occupation Tax (B & O tax) levied by the State of Washington. ORS 316.082(1) provides, in part:

“A resident individual shall be allowed a credit against the tax otherwise due under this chapter for the amount of any income tax imposed on the individual * * * for the taxable year by another state of the United States * * * on income derived from sources therein and that is also subject to tax under this chapter.” (Emphasis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Zunamon v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Morris v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Avni V. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000
  5. Ludwig v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API