Legal Opinion

State v. Heins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1995No. 1994-0686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 504.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HEINS, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CALHOUN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Heins,

1995-Ohio-208.] Evidence—Witnesses—Competency—State Highway Patrol officer who conducts speed checks for purpose of monitoring compliance with traffic laws is competent to testify under Evid.R. 601(C) and R.C. 4549.14 and 4549.16. A State Highway Patrol aircraft that is operated for the purpose of conducting speed checks is not a "motor vehicle," and therefore does not fall within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Columbus v. MurchisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. FosterOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. HeinsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MakuchOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API