Legal Opinion

Hodgman v. Chicago & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In this case, which is an appeal by the defendant (the railroad company,) from an order of the district court for Goodhue county overruling its general demurrer to .the complaint, the opinion states the nature of the action, and the allegations of the complaint, or such portions as are material to an understanding of the points presented and discussed, and a further statement is unnecessary.

Read the full summary

In this case, which is an appeal by the defendant (the railroad company,) from an order of the district court for Goodhue county overruling its general demurrer to .the complaint, the opinion states the nature of the action, and the allegations of the complaint, or such portions as are material to an understanding of the points presented and discussed, and a further statement is unnecessary. I. This action is brought to restrain the issuance by the city of Red Wing of certain bonds agreed by said city to be issued, in aid of the above named appellant, in the construction of its railway. * * *…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Berrv, J.

This action is brought to restrain the authorities of the city of Red Wing from issuing, and the appellant from receiving certain bonds of said city. The appellant claims that it is entitled to the bonds (in amount $85,000,) under an agreement and ordinance of said city, entered into and adopted in pursuance of an act of the legislature authorizing the same to be issued in aid of the construction of appellant’s railway. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a resident of said Red Wing, and owner of certain described real estate situate therein of the value of *53more…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Roosevelt v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. City of New London v. BrainardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  4. Harney v. Indianapolis, Crawfordsville, & Danville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Webster v. Town of HarwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawson v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sherman v. BellowsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Minneapolis Tribune Co. v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Skyllingstad v. GunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Steiner v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API