Legal Opinion
Cardenas-Celestino v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 7, 2008No. Case No. 08-00224-CV-W-GAF. Crim. No. 05-00193-01-CR-W-GAFPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOVANT’S § 2255 MOTION
GARY A. FENNER, District Judge.
Movant Cardenas-Celestino pleaded guilty to a federal drug violation and was sentenced to 135 months’ imprisonment. Cardenas-Celestino appealed, unsuccessfully arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a consent search. Cardenas-Celestino now has filed a § 2255 motion, in which he presents a renewed claim regarding the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress and a claim that the United States Criminal Code is not valid law and therefore the court lacked…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cruz v. House of Representatives of the United StatesaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Adcock v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cruz v. House of Representatives of the U.S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- HAILEY v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- MOWRY v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.