Legal Opinion

Rupe v. Robison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1926No. 19416. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This is an action to rescind a contract, whereby conveyances were made between the parties, upon the ground that title to the property delivered pursuant thereto by defendant Will A. Robison had a cloud thereon. The case was tried upon stipulated facts. Briefly summarized they are: the wife of the defendant Robison was declared insane in 1913, and he was appointed her general guardian. He later brought suit for divorce on the ground that his wife had incurable dementia. The prayer was for divorce and possession of the community real estate of the parties. The insane wife was served by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLane v. CurranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Davis v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Manuel v. WhiteheadTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guardianship of WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Dill v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Department of Social & Health Services v. GabhartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. In Re the Guardianship of MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API