Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ex Parte Howard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1985No. 69,167Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTeague, Judge

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of Clint Warren Howard, applicant. See Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Howard is the same defendant as the one in Howard v. State, our no. 0291-84, which case is pending before this Court on appellant’s petition for discretionary review. This Court has granted Howard’s petition for discretionary review in order to review the decision of the Dallas Court of Appeals that held that because a magistrate was used in that cause, pursuant to Art. 1918c, V.A.C.S., that this did not, standing alone, void the applicant’s conviction…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Ex Parte SalfenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API