Legal Opinion

Nash v. Nash

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1983No. 82-715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YELVERTON, Judge.

The issue in this reduction of alimony appeal is whether a wife’s prolonged failure to seek employment necessarily constitutes a change in circumstances under La. Civil Code art. 160, thus justifying a modification of an earlier alimony judgment. The trial court held that it does and reduced alimony. The wife appealed. We reverse and dismiss the husband’s rule to reduce alimony. We hold that where there has been a consent judgment fixing alimony under circumstances where the wife was not then working, and where the evidence discloses the wife’s future employment was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Howell v. HowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Willis v. WillisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Bass v. BassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Cormier v. CormierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Halpern v. HalpernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Gaidry v. GaidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API