Legal Opinion

Marshall Jackson v. Charles B. Miller, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 8, 2001No. 98-3736PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

On June 4, 1980, a jury found Marshall Jackson guilty of robbery, attempted murder, and of being a habitual offender under Indiana’s recidivist statute. See Ind.Code § 35-50-2-8 (1998). At sentencing, the judge enhanced Jackson’s forty-year sentence by thirty years because of Jackson’s status as a habitual offender. Jackson contends that the resulting seventy-year sentence was improper because one of the two convictions that the jury relied upon to make the habitual offender determination was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. He advanced this…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Arredondo v. HuibregtseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Toliver v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Virsnieks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Ben-Yisrayl v. BussCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Carl Dixon v. Donald I. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API