Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Allen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1932No. 7151PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Pííesident:

This is a condemnation proceeding. Several years ago Grover Allen became the owner of a tract of about fourteen acres near the Big Bend tunnel on the C. & 0. railroad. He was desirous of building a house within a few feet of his boundary line, and acquired from a neighbor about two-thirds of an acre adjoining, for use as a back yard. The house was built with stone walls and is estimated to have cost about $9,500. Two years ago he added 29 acres to his boundary, all of which is valuable only for farming purposes. In this proceeding the railroad company condemns practically…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckhannon & Northern Railroad v. Great Scott Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Virginian Power Co. v. BrothertonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co. v. Monongahela Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Strouds Creek & Muddlety Railroad v. HeroldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Road Commission v. DarrahWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API