States v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.
Introduction
Corey States (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State of Missouri (“State”), Movant pleaded guilty to two counts of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer and one count of resisting arrest. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing because his factual allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Vaca v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D'Andre Hayes, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Wesley E. Marks v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019