Bidell v. Poyer
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court.
Geo. W. Bidell w.l Joshua Poyer j
Certo— to Justice Chipman-
June Term A.D. 1835
Action of assumpsit brought by plff. below against Deft.— Parties appeared, went to trial, and after the testimony was closed on the part of Deft, below, the plff. below, asked for a continuance for the want of a witness— Which was opposed by Deft, but granted by the Justice.
1 This, the Plff. in error contends, was a discontinuance of the case. And the Justice erred, in proceeding to hear additional testimony next day. 1 Johns. Dig. 457-467. Cowen Treatise 516.
2 An adjournment improperly granted, is a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Green v. AngelNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Fink v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1811