Legal Opinion

Bidell v. Poyer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1835Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court.

Geo. W. Bidell w.l Joshua Poyer j

Certo— to Justice Chipman-

June Term A.D. 1835

Action of assumpsit brought by plff. below against Deft.— Parties appeared, went to trial, and after the testimony was closed on the part of Deft, below, the plff. below, asked for a continuance for the want of a witness— Which was opposed by Deft, but granted by the Justice.

1 This, the Plff. in error contends, was a discontinuance of the case. And the Justice erred, in proceeding to hear additional testimony next day. 1 Johns. Dig. 457-467. Cowen Treatise 516.

2 An adjournment improperly granted, is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. AngelNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Fink v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1811

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API