Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 2001-SC-0707-DGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

149 S.W.3d 382 (2004)

Jerel PURCELL, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Appellee.

No. 2001-SC-0707-DG.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

November 18, 2004.

Charles W. Rolph, Flemingsburg, David O. Welch, Law Office of David O. Welch, Ashland, for Counsel for Appellant.

Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General, Perry T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Frankfort, Counsel for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court by Justice COOPER.

Appellant, Jerel Purcell, photographed a nude male child under the age of sixteen, and was subsequently convicted by a Fleming…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API