Legal Opinion

Vanmali v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided April 9, 2012No. Docket No. 4235-09LUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

B.M. VANMALI AND BHARI VANMALI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Vanmali v. Comm'r

Docket No. 4235-09L

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2012-100; 2012 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 100; 103 T.C.M. (CCH) 1550;

April 9, 2012, Filed

An appropriate order and decision will be entered.

Harris Hastings Barnes III, for petitioners.

John F. Driscoll and John W. Sheffield III, for respondent.

THORNTON, Judge.

THORNTON

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THORNTON, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 121. 1 The issue for decision is whether…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Woodral v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brombach v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API