Legal Opinion
Berry v. Littlefield, Alvord & Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 5, 1924No. 3990PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
Margaret M. Berry, claiming to have sustained personal injuries in a collision between an automobile she was driving and a truck belonging to Eittlefield, Alvord & Co., .instituted an action in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia for damages. There was a jury trial, which resulted in a verdict against her, and, judgment having been entered for the defendant, she appeals.
The collision took place on Twentieth street, just north of F, in Washington. According to plaintiff’s testimony she drove a Ford runabout westerly on E street, and when she reached Twentieth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Vogel v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Combs v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Loomis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Farr v. RouillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. BradenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Smiths America Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1956
- Davis v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- George Washington University v. LawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hudson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.