Legal Opinion

Raphael Glass Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1932No. 3593Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, described by the appraiser on the invoice as “colored rolled glass, ” some under one-half inch, and the other one-half inch or over, in thickness, was assessed by the collector at the port of Los Angeles with a duty of 5 per centum ad valorem, in addition to the rates otherwise chargeable thereon, under paragraph 224 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

The importer protested, claiming that “5% additional duty was erroneously assessed on rolled glass cold over ji inch in thickness.” The protest was dated June 15, 1931.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GandolfiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API