Legal Opinion

David Henry Caldwell v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1986No. 85-3748PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TANG, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the denial of a habe-as corpus petition in which Caldwell claims he was unlawfully arrested and searched in violation of the fourth amendment. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the failure of the district court to articulate the facts and reasoning for its decision denied Caldwell a full and fair hearing.

FACTS

Before his state court trial, appellant moved to suppress the introduction into evidence of a knife on the ground that it was the fruit of an unconstitutional search and arrest. The trial court held an eviden-tiary hearing on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. William R. Cody v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Arthur William Mack v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Michael Knaubert v. Goldsmith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Stephen Newman v. Timothy WenglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Date v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Gerlaugh v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
  5. Faust v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API