Legal Opinion

Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 6, 1932No. 436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Upon tile theory that the Susquehanna Steamship Company was ojierating the ship Panola as agent for the appellee, the appellant seeks to recover on a judgment obtained in the state Supreme Court. The recovery is for a breach of a contract of carriage. The ship Panola was a merchant vessel owned by the United States. Under the authority of United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Lustgarten, 280 U. S. 320, 50 S. Ct. 118, 74 L. Ed. 451, and Weinstein v. Black Diamond S. S. Corp., 40 F.(2d) 590 (C. C. A. 2), the exclusive remedy as against the United States is under the Suits in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Weinstein v. Black Diamond S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dietrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API