Legal Opinion

Payson v. Village of Milan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1908No. Gen. No. 4,907Published

Trespass on the case. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. Emery C. Graves, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion

Opinion

2Per curiam

Upon a petition for a rehearing appellee contends that the view by the jury in this case was practically by consent, and that we have failed to give due consideration to Culbertson & Blair Provision Co. v. City of Chicago, 111 Ill. 651, where in a suit for damages to real estate an instruction was approved which told the jury that as the parties had by mutual consent allowed the jury to view the premises, they had the right in finding their verdict to take into account such facts as they learned by viewing the property. Four Illinois cases were there cited as supporting said…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McReynolds v. Burlington & Ohio River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Peoria Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Peoria Terminal Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. City of Chicago v. SpoorIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kiernan v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API