Legal Opinion
Hume v. Laurel Hill Cemetery
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Decided October 9, 1905No. 13,457PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. On demurrer to bill and amendments.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
Complainant brings this action to obtain a writ of injunction against the defendants, enjoining them, during the pendency of the suit and until further order of the court, from enforcing and attempting to carry into effect the provisions of an ordinance, numbered 25, passed by the city council of the city of San Francisco, prohibiting the burial of the dead within the city and county of San Francisco, and from in anywise preventing or interfering with the complainant in the burial of the dead body of Sarah R. Macbeth in a certain burial plot alleged to belong to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Glover v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Perrin v. Mountain View Mausoleum Assn.California Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Petters & Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Hardin v. HuckabayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927