Legal Opinion

Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Suburban Telephone Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1963No. 7285PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

We are here concerned with a controversy between two competing telephone companies. Neither party to the case being satisfied with the trial court’s decision, one appealed and the other cross-appealed.

For clarity, Suburban Telephone Company, (which is the appellant and cross-appellee) will be referred to merely as “Suburban,” and The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (appellee and cross-appellant) will be simply termed “Mountain States.”

Mountain States brought suit against Suburban in the District Court of Catron County, to enjoin Suburban from constructing or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Petty v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Puget Sound Navigation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Minor v. Homestake-Sapin Partners MineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lance v. New Mexico Military InstituteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lopez v. K. B. Kennedy Engineering Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. City of Las Cruces v. Rio Grande Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gish v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API