Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Suburban Telephone Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
We are here concerned with a controversy between two competing telephone companies. Neither party to the case being satisfied with the trial court’s decision, one appealed and the other cross-appealed.
For clarity, Suburban Telephone Company, (which is the appellant and cross-appellee) will be referred to merely as “Suburban,” and The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (appellee and cross-appellant) will be simply termed “Mountain States.”
Mountain States brought suit against Suburban in the District Court of Catron County, to enjoin Suburban from constructing or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petty v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Puget Sound Navigation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Minor v. Homestake-Sapin Partners MineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Lance v. New Mexico Military InstituteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Lopez v. K. B. Kennedy Engineering Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Las Cruces v. Rio Grande Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Gish v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.