Pfister v. Graton & Knight Manufacturing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Judge. Plaintiff Pfister commenced an action in the superior court of Milwaukee county to recover from defendants, as copart-ners, $47,000. Such proceedings were duly had in the action that the personal property of the defendants, located in the ■city of Milwaukee, was attached and thereafter sold for about $7,000. After such sale, judgment for plaintiff was entered by default for $41,833.44. The…
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Judge. Plaintiff Pfister commenced an action in the superior court of Milwaukee county to recover from defendants, as copart-ners, $47,000. Such proceedings were duly had in the action that the personal property of the defendants, located in the ■city of Milwaukee, was attached and thereafter sold for about $7,000. After such sale, judgment for plaintiff was entered by default for $41,833.44. The net proceeds of the sale aforesaid were applied in part payment of such judgment. Before judgment plaintiff garnished the…
1Opinion of the CourtMaeshall, J.
The facts presented in support of the application of appellant for leave to intervene and attack the plaintiff’s judgmeht on the ground that it was entered for other than partnership indebtedness were all presented on the application of defendants to set aside their default and for leave to defend in the action. The latter application was denied by the lower court, and such denial was affirmed on appeal to this court. Pfister v. Smith, 95 Wis. 51. That necessarily *211settled finally, as between plaintiff and the defendants, tbat the judgment is for partnership indebtedness and that plaintiff is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thayer v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Pfister v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897