Legal Opinion

Milhollin v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

Milhollin and others presented their petition to the board of commissioners of Warren county, praying for the establishing of a county road. Viewers were appointed, who reported in favor of the proposed road. Thomas appeared and filed a remonstrance, on the *166ground that the road, if established, would not be of pub-lie utility; whereupon reviewers were appointed, who reported that the road would be of public utility. Thomas then made his claim for damages, because the road was located through his land; and on his motion, three freeholders were appointed, pursuant to the statute, who reported…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Forsyth v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Washington Ice Co. v. LayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Daggy v. CoatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Sunier v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API