Legal Opinion

City of St. Joseph v. Christgen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1974No. 58332PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Edwin B. Christgen, charged with violating § 16-129 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Joseph, was found guilty by a jury, and he was fined $50. From the judgment of conviction he has appealed, asserting that the ordinance violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, and Article I, §§ 8, 10 and 19 of the Constitution of Missouri, V. A.M.S., as a result of which this Court has jurisdiction.

Section 16-129 relating to disorderly conduct, provides as follows: “No person shall conduct himself in a disorderly manner, or make or create any…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Wann v. Reorganized School District No. 6 of St. Francois CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. State v. MusserIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Nelson v. City of NatchezMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. BrastWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heart of America Council, Boy Scouts of America and Boy Scouts of America, Relators v. The Honorable Charles H. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Division of the Council on Human Relations of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Carver v. WhippleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. T.A.B. v. CorriganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API