Legal Opinion

Rookard v. Mexicoach

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1982No. 79-3592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

680 F.2d 1257

David ROOKARD and Fiona Rookard, individually, and as

husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

MEXICOACH, a California Corporation; Transportes Del

Pacifico S. A. de C. V.; Autotransportes Tres

Estrellas De Oro, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79-3592.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 5, 1982.

Decided July 6, 1982.

As Amended July 28, 1982.

1

Gary L. Stuart, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

2

J. Tim Konold, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, San Diego, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

3

Appeal from the United States District Court for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Dorkin v. American Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  5. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Lindie Banks v. Northern Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Security Pacific Finance Corp. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Eastern Trading Co v. Refco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Farouault v. American Aviation IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API