Legal Opinion

Gould v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 29, 2009No. Civil Action 07-11745-RCLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard Gould (“Gould”) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and permit a conditional change of plea under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e). 1 Gould is currently serving a ten year sentence, followed by five years of supervised release, for two convictions relating to the possession and distribution of OxyContin pills. Gould seeks restoration of his appellate rights under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) in order to appeal Judge Lindsay’s denial of his motion to suppress post-arrest statements attributed to him. He alleges that his attorney,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smoak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  2. United States v. Cruz-MercedesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API