Legal Opinion

Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 2012No. Nos. 09 Civ. 0118(VM)(THK), 09 Civ. 8500 (Headway), 10 Civ. 0920 (Maridom)Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

By Decision and Order dated April 13, 2012 (the “April 13 Order”), the Court denied leave to amend the complaints of plaintiffs Headway Investment Corp. (“Headway”), and Maridom Ltd., Caribetrans, S.A., and Abbot Capital, Inc. (with Maridom Ltd. and Caribetrans, S.A., the “Maridom Plaintiffs”). (See Docket No. 853.) Headway and the Maridom Plaintiffs (together, “Plaintiffs”) had sought to add new defendants, claims, and factual allegations to their respective complaints. (See Docket Nos., 815, 838.) Specifically, the Court denied Headway’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. In Re Health Management Systems, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API